NJ Criminal Defense

In ALL 21 NJ Counties
FREE Defense Consultation:

Open 24/7  (732) 385-3339
(888) 628-8394

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • All Practice Areas
    • Assault Charges
    • Arson Charges
    • Bad Checks Charges
    • Bail Jumping Charges
    • Burglary Charges
    • Cell Phone Ticket
    • Credit Card Theft And Fraud Charges
    • Criminal Coercion Charges
    • Criminal Sexual Assault Charges
    • Criminal Mischief Charges
    • Criminal Sexual Contact Charges
    • Criminal Harassment Charges
    • Domestic Violence Charges
    • Driving on a Suspended or Revoked License Charges
    • Driving Without Insurance Charges
    • Drug Possession Charges
    • Marijuana Possession Charges
    • Cocaine Possession Charges
    • Heroin Possession Charges
    • Methamphetamine Possession Charges
    • Drug Possession with Intent Charges
    • Embezzlement Charges
    • Criminal Record Expungement
    • Eluding Charges
    • False Imprisonment Charges
    • Gun/Firearms/Weapons Charges
    • Forgery Charges
    • Criminal Fraud Charges
    • Manslaughter or Murder Charges
    • Insurance Fraud Charges
    • Invasion of Privacy Charges
    • Kidnapping Charges
    • Theft Charges
    • Leaving the Scene of an Accident Charges
    • Prostitution Charges
    • Receiving Stolen Property Charges
    • Reckless Driving Charges
    • Resisting Arrest Charges
    • Violation of a Restraining Order Charges
    • Robbery Charges
    • School Zone Distribution of Drugs Charges
    • Shoplifting Charges
    • Simple Assault
    • Stalking Charges
    • Terroristic Threats Charges
    • Traffic and Driving Charges
    • Trespassing Charges
    • Juvenile Alcohol Possession Charges
    • Underage Drinking Charges
  • Case Results
  • About
    • About Our Firm
    • Certified Municipal Court Lawyer
    • Fees
  • Our Reviews
  • Q & A
  • Contact

As seen on

Reisig Criminal Defense & DWI Law, LLC ABC News
Reisig Criminal Defense & DWI Law, LLC New York
Reisig Criminal Defense & DWI Law, LLC CBS New York
Reisig Criminal Defense & DWI Law, LLC Fox News
Reisig Criminal Defense & DWI Law, LLC New York Post
Reisig Criminal Defense & DWI Law, LLC New York Times
Reisig Criminal Defense & DWI Law, LLC NJ True Jersey
Reisig Criminal Defense & DWI Law, LLC New Jersey Herald

My Criminal Trial For Theft Has Been Postponed at Least Five Times Because the Prosecution’s Key Witness Has Failed To Appear

July 9, 2013 by Matthew Reisig

At what point can I seek to have my case dismissed on this basis?

These question presupposes that there has been an executed plea cutoff which has resulted in a scheduled trial date. A plea cutoff form as promulgated by the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), which is signed by the given county prosecutor’s officer or Attorney General, the defense attorney, the criminal part judge, and the defendant him/herself.

A Motion to Dismiss an Indictment can be filed at any time by a defendant prior to a scheduled trial date. Obviously, the judge will evaluate such a motion in the context of the circumstances presented within same. If a trial date keeps getting adjourned (postponed), the defense attorney should file such a motion.

At some point, the State has to present its case with the witnesses needed for such prosecution. If the State is having difficulty in procuring a particular witness or witnesses, that is their problem. An experienced and skilled defense attorney will know if this is the case.

The answer to the literal question is that there is no particular time period that must transpire before such a motion to dismiss is filed. For instance, the question presented does not reveal the timeframe by which these five requests for adjournment of a trial date have occurred.

All courts are sensitive toward providing due process to the defendant while also allowing the State a sufficient time period to organize their witness list to allow for prosecution. Necessarily, each case has to be evaluated on its own particular facts and circumstances.

On its face, five separate adjournments of a scheduled trial dates for the unavailability of a witness or or witnesses provides an absolute basis for a defense attorney to move to dismiss his or her client’s case. It should be noted that judges are given wide discretion in granting or denying these motions.

The question presented relates closely to constitutional principles of double jeopardy an speedy trial. These constitutional imperatives can only be evaluated in the context of more specific information related to a specific case.

If you need assistance with a criminal matter, call Attorney Matthew Reisig at 732-625-9661.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

Reisig Criminal Defense & DWI Law, LLC if you want to win1

RECENT POSTS

  • Police Welcome Drop in Crime During Covid-19 Lockdown; Worry Over Spike in Domestic Violence Calls
  • Domestic Violence Incidents Climb Dangerously During Covid-19 Lockdown
  • NJ’s Attorney General Cracks Down on Coronavirus Threats
  • Have You Been Charged With Domestic Violence in New Jersey During The Covid-19 Lockdown?
  • Criminal Lawyer Details Racketeering Charges & Penalties In NJ

HAVE A QUESTION? TYPE IT HERE

Categories

Reisig Criminal Defense & DWI Law, LLC Location

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?

"*" indicates required fields

We offer free consultations. No office visit required, we will get back to you within 24 hours.

* ALL FIELDS REQUIRED

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Call Us Today: (888) 628-8394 or (732) 385-3339

© 2021 Reisig Criminal Defense & DWI Law, LLC
125 Half Mile Road, Suite 200, Red Bank, NJ 07701  (732)*625*9661
2500 Plaza 5, 25th floor, Jersey City, NJ 07311  (201) 793-7226
923 Haddonfield Rd, Suite #300, Cherry Hill, NJ 08002  (856) 334-0559
317 George Street, 3rd Floor, New Brunswick, NJ 08901  (732) 659-0984
Attorney Advertising / Disclaimer / Privacy Policy

* The reference to 1,389 cases without a DWI conviction applies to cases prior to November 1, 2017. This information should not create an unjustified expectation that similar results can be obtained for others without regard to the specific factual and legal circumstances.

** 82% Winning Percentage at Trial is from 2012 through 2017.